Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Satire, race, and raw nerves

Published: Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 20:04

I don't know how much good this is going to do. Since many of the people offended by my April Fools' joke column "Enjoy Obamacare if you like payin for illegal Mexicans" have admittedly never read my leftist, borderline ideologue column before, perhaps it's unlikely that they'll read this one. But here goes.

In CBS News 4's staggeringly "fair and balanced" report on the shitstorm that followed our April 1 edition, UC Denver student Doron Katriel was quoted saying, "It just hit me, like, wait a minute. These are people's true opinions, and they used April 1st as a time to cover it up."

That there may be no doubt, let me make my "true opinions" known: For one, I am about as hard-line in favor of immigration as it's possible to get, illegal or not. In the richest country in the world, it's appalling to me that we're so willing to grab any excuse we can to exclude the citizens of our neighbor to the south from sharing what we have, as if there's not enough of it to go around.

Of course, there really are plenty of people who will argue things like, "Them Mexicans are takin' our jobs," and will do so with a straight face. It's a perverse rationale. The root of that kind of argument is selfishness, elitism, and xenophobia.

In my column, it was my intent to portray those offensive views for what they are: ignorant and absurd. As many of the outraged parties helpfully pointed out, it was poorly written, stupidly argued, and riddled with spelling and grammatical errors. Folks, that was the whole point: People who think this way are idiots. Joke's on them.

Nevertheless, in the conversations I had with offended parties last week, a theme emerged: I went too far. I touched a nerve. As a white male, how could I possibly understand what it's like to be the victim of racism like this on a daily basis?

I can't. But I do know that racism of exactly this kind absolutely exists—and as a white male, I know all too well how many white people would like to believe it doesn't. Especially now, with a black man in the presidency, there's a particular danger of making the calming assumption that we live in a post-racial happy fun-land. It's tempting to think that the fact of a black man in the White House absolves us of the reality that minorities still face: the insidious bigotry, both cultural and institutional, that persists in this society. The evidence of it is ample.

At the rally on Monday, April 5, I was asked to apologize. I politely declined. Since it was difficult, over the noise of the booing, to articulate my reasons for that, I will do so now.

I would not apologize then because I am not sorry for what I wrote. I am, however, sorry for the effect it had. I am sorry that, in their haste to confront what they perceived as racism, the victims of it confronted not that racism itself, but a joke at its expense. It saddens me personally to be the figure at the receiving end of their anger. And I especially regret the crass opportunism this institution has engaged in by directing that anger toward a convenient scapegoat.

But I will not apologize for calling that racism out, nor do I regret calling it out through satire, a subtle yet effective means of social commentary. In a conversation I had with Katriel after CBS's newscast, he asked me what my goal was in writing the column. My answer is this: As a political writer—and let's be honest, I'm basically a pundit—my goal is to make people think, to challenge their assumptions, and yeah, at times to make them angry. And it's my belief that people should be angry about the way race is treated in this country—I certainly am.

On Monday, a lot of people came out to voice their outrage about just that. And although I would rather not be the target of that outrage, it's still, on principle, an outrage I support 100 percent.

And in that way, I think I've done my job.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

19 comments

fly
Thu Apr 22 2010 03:50
good
Anonymous
Fri Apr 16 2010 15:08
It never ceases to amaze me that when humans have illegitimate protests, and when they are presented with logical arguments, they inevitably resort to personal attacks. If you all were actually offended and not just pontificating and riding the wave of shit-stirring, you would actually be involved in a valid debate. Unfortunately, when those on either side of the political spectrum are so heavily influenced by their emotion, not rational problem-solution investigation, the conversation quickly turns to the opposition's bodyweight (or something equally irrelevant). This issue is no longer (nor was it ever) about the article that Jef had every right to publish, it's not about the first amendment, it's not about whether Jef is funny or a good writer. It is a rage and wound-licking session that is inappropriately directed at a fellow activist. Come on people. As relatively well-educated adults, isn't there another avenue through which to be heard? Isn't there a better place to be focusing our energy? A rational human being would have read Jef's original article and, whether finding his writing amusing or not, would have thought, "Yep. Red neck racist jerks do still exist. That makes me angry. Perhaps I can educate or somehow legally eradicate this racist point of view." But instead you shot the messenger who was using humor as a means to relate. Way to go.
Kim
Thu Apr 15 2010 06:29
Bravo, Jef. I've never read any of your columns before, but I thought the Obama care column was good and this one is too. You've obviously put a lot more thought into all this subject matter than any of your opposition. You've gained a reader.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 22:53
I can’t. But I do know that racism of exactly this kind absolutely exists—and as a white male, I know all too well how many white people would like to believe it doesn’t. Especially now, with a black man in the presidency, there’s a particular danger of making the calming assumption that we live in a post-racial happy fun-land. It’s tempting to think that the fact of a black man in the White House absolves us of the reality that minorities still face: the insidious bigotry, both cultural and institutional, that persists in this society. The evidence of it is ample.

Oh Great. The annointed white savior "understands" racism so well that he's got jokes and can tell the colored folks when and when not to be offended by his own racist ideation. Somehow, Otte is exempt from critique because he was well intentioned and has "true opinions" that are at variance with the jokes.

I actually agree that satire can be an effective form of social commentary. However, none of the content in the April Fools addition accomplished that. All that crap was racist, insenstive drivel. The social commentary that was really accomplished was the revelation of the (well meaning) racist ideation of the Advocate staff.

Congratulations.

I find it ironic that staff would try to hide behind intentions of being anti-racist. Because it seems clear that they do not really have a good idea about what racism is and the diversity of ways it is manifest in society. They will come to know though. Because this issue and their part in it, will become a classic example of racist ideation and expression. It will follow them. Classic fail.

Congratulations

Anonymous
Wed Apr 14 2010 17:58
This is gay. And retarded. Now let's all get outraged about my derogatory use of the word "gay" to describe something as "lame." And let's also get outraged at my use of the word "retarded" to describe something as "stupid."

Since it doesn't have anything to with blacks or Hispanics, it's ok........right?

Josh Cain
Wed Apr 14 2010 17:33
Look at the smart debate occuring here! Name calling and nit-picking has no place in an educated debate and by posting immature comments such as yours, David and Katie, you are detracting from the overall conversation. Notice....I did not call either of you immature, but your final comments certainly provide nothing of importance. David, it doesn't seem that you're upset at paying your mandatory RTD fees when they're out on the road killing people. Maybe you should take the fight to THEIR doorstep, too. You're still paying taxes, I assume? Which means you (and I) are continuing to fund the killing of innocent (as well as guilty) people all over the world. How many people would've been this pissed off had he made a joke about some little kids gluing his shoes together for him for fractions of a cent?

Susan: I didn't write the original post you responded to with this "Address me by name all you want but as long as you remain anonymous, I could care less what you think of my opinion." My name's Josh...it's nice to meet you! I think you are entitled to be offended. You are not entitled to an apology or reparations for that. I've said the same thing as "anonymous" but have done so with a name attached to it. Do you care more, now? Or is it only your opinion that is valid on this because you put your name on your post? Did you dislike that the post was anonymous or that it ran contrary to your own opinion?

David S
Mon Apr 12 2010 18:37
Oh I get your point Katie. As I said earlier ... I'm not stupid. It's no surprise that you're just as funny as Jef ... which isn't very funny at all, but at least I don't have to pay you for it.

Sincerely willing to buy you a tub of Ice Cream if you shut up,

David S

Katie
Sat Apr 10 2010 11:31
David S-
I can read; I read that already in your first post, and I still think that that is a valid statement. However, by using the phrase "A Big Girl Like Katie" you have offended me, and I demand an apology. I think that you are offending the entire overweight population, and I will not stand for this!
respectfully,
-Are you smart enough to get my point-
David S
Sat Apr 10 2010 01:36
I'm with you Katie, on the fact that I should stop reading this crap, atleast I have a choice in that matter. But what I'd really like even more is to stop paying for it.

-- A big girl like katie

katie
Fri Apr 9 2010 22:39
I think that it is stupid that people are offended enough at this article to pitch a fit. If someone dosen't like the article then they should stop reading it. Grow up and act like an adult. Also, why would Jef apoogize for something he did not do? Really, adults need to learn that they will be offended, and everyone will not apologize for offending them. The sooner they learn this, the sooner they can join the real world.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 9 2010 22:34
I think you are a great writer. Keep up the good work :)
David S
Fri Apr 9 2010 21:13
It's sad that I'm funding this paper, and Jef's paycheck through "mandatory student fees." You're article pissed people off Jef, the least you could do is apologize to them. It truly is the least you could do, and the fact that you are not willing to do that, proves our points entirely. I know what satire is, and I understand "Freedom of Speech." The Advocate's dwindling base of readers are not stupid ... I think you're just missing the point here.

You screwed up. You incorporated Racism as a way to get laughs, and although you claim to not be racist ... you are enabling a certain type of ignorance that merits no excuses. Furthermore, you are a terrible writer! It makes me laugh knowing that you think of yourself as someone who's contemporary and bad ass, when really you just suck. I'm sick of seeing your articles in MY school newspaper!! Get over yourself Jef Otte's, you're not as cool as you think you are.

Sincerely,

A Better Gay than Jef Otte

Susan
Fri Apr 9 2010 18:01
I am not a coward, and I will stand behind my opinion by putting my name in my post. I don't ask for an apology in my post, and am not impressed by your repetition of my use of the word 'offended'. Address me by name all you want but as long as you remain anonymous, I could care less what you think of my opinion. My post was meant for Jef anyway. At the very least, thanks for your entertaining, nameless, and meaningless response.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 9 2010 12:51
Dear Susan,

You have the right to be offended. You have no right to an apology or reparations because of it. I find it offensive that you're offended, but I would never expect an apology. If you don't like it, stop reading it. But to expect someone as left-wing as Jef to apologize for criticizing racist ideology borders on the absurd.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Anonymous
Fri Apr 9 2010 02:16
“It just hit me, like, wait a minute. These are people’s true opinions, and they used April 1st as a time to cover it up.”
Wow . . . Just, wow. If this is the intellectual caliber of your opposition, may as well give up trying to reason with them.
Susan Torres
Thu Apr 8 2010 23:03
Jef: As someone who strongly opposed your article, I can somewhat appreciate your attempt to clarify your true beliefs. I have been reading the many responses from the Advocate to the outrage. The main gist of the releases are: our intent is not to offend people. Well my question to you and your staff is: what do plan to do now that you have offended people?

As a woman of color, you have offended me. Please don't publish articles saying how much you believe in my rights, if my being offended can't make you second guess your approach to these topics. Saying your sorry for my lack of understanding is in itself offensive.

Despite your lack of apology, I would at least like to think that you learned a lesson from all this because you do truly care about these matters. It's all too easy to defend yourself and sit in your ivory tower. If everything you say above is true, it would hurt you that you have offended those you sought to protect. Is all the compassion you speak about above keeping you from seeing the other side? Open your eyes.

Anonymous
Thu Apr 8 2010 22:50
Jef: As someone who strongly opposed your article, I can somewhat appreciate your attempt to clarify your true beliefs. I have been reading the many responses from the Advocate to the outrage. The main gist of the releases are: our intent is not to offend people. Well my question to you and your staff is: what do plan to do now that you have offended people?

As a woman of color, you have offended me. Please don't publish articles saying how much you believe in my rights, if my being offended can't make you second guess your approach to these topics. Saying your sorry for my lack of understanding is in itself offensive.

Despite your lack of apology, I would at least like to think that you learned a lesson from all this because you do truly care about these matters. It's all too easy to defend yourself and sit in your ivory tower. If everything you say above is true, it would hurt you that you have offended those you sought to protect. Is all the compassion you speak about above keeping you from seeing the other side? Open your eyes.

Hali
Thu Apr 8 2010 17:19
It can never be said enough, RACISM IS NOT A JOKE. In a world where people are verbally assaulted, physically assaulted (or even worse, murdered) by racists and hate crimes are at their all time high, how can we ever see humor in something so backwards? It's not funny because people actually THINK this way, and by laughing and saying it's just a joke is just wrong.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 8 2010 17:17
Get over yourself!
geez the pompous, holier than thou-smarter than all attitude just oozes through your writing. so people's feelings are illegitimate because they're just not smart enough to "get" the "subtle art of satire"? PLEASE!
Oh and on the subject of your....satire, something comes to mind, what was it?! ehh.. something about chickens and sticking a feather duster in my butt....oh well, im sure you'll pick it up, what with all your super smarts!
what an overblown tool you are....
kisses!




log out